- Pronouns
- He/Him
What @Astrogamer said.
Think of it like this (imaginary numbers used): A bad Pokemon-game sells 20 mio units. Now you want Gamefreak to take their time and spend 4 years on a good Pokemon-game. Question: Will that good Pokemon-game sell so much more itself that it can match or surpass the profit from 4 yearly bad Pokemon-games. In this example, the good Pokemon-game would have to sell 80 mio units to make the same profit. That much growth is impossible for the Pokemon-franchise. Even just doubling is, assuming they'd go for a 2-year cycle.
There's only two factors that could change Gamefreak's/TPC's mind: Pokemon-games stop selling AND/OR a new Pokemon-game releasing in such broken state that Nintendo has to intervene. Unfortunately, the latter seems to be our better chance.
This is a flawed argument because you’re associating your personal opinion about the games with GF’s push to do better. It’s like when people criticized Xenoblade 2 for being a bad game, saying that a good Xenoblade would sell so much more, despite 2 being the one to push the series forward.I have so much I disagree about what you guys are saying, but I'll limit myself to this: Pokemon-games are "creative", Gamefreak is pushing forward, questionmark. In what universe is this true. Gamefreak basically have to be dragged forward by the entire industry, all the changes you mention happen because even Gamefreak realizes "we cannot do even less than that". Going "more to 3DS after DS era success", yeah, because 3D had been the standard for games for the past 15 years or so while Pokemon-games still had a fixed camera perspective. Arceus was nice, but it also did the minimum possible, with empty areas, barebones towns and the deliberate choice to not feature multiplayer-online battles. And we don't need to talk abot Scarlet/Violet.
To praise Gamefreak for its creativity and forward pushing really is the opposite of reality and claiming so is part of the problem. If I were Gamefreak/TPC and read your postings, I'd think "hm, guess we don't need to improve, we're pretty awesome after all". The last thing Gamefreak needs right now is praise. I'm forever thankful that the collective Zelda-fandom said after Skyword Sword: "This is enough. No more of this. We want something better!" and so we got Breath of the Wild. Before Pokemon-fans, at least those active on the internet on message boards or social media, realize that, there really is zero incentive for Gamefreak to change anything. The last Pokemon-mainline game I played was Black and White 2 or X/Y, whichever came later. But this doesn't mean I don't care about Pokemon, quite the opposite: I'm waiting for the day we finally get that heralded dream-Pokemon-game that brings everything together, including stunning graphics and voice-acting. When that happens, I'll be there day 1. But I will firmaly boycott these games until then.
The fact you’re considering people who genuinely think Legends and SV are good games as people who live in the opposite of reality and as being part of the problem, is very condescending and oblivious on your part.