I'm not expecting anything specific as it's more a personal thought on how I think this christmas is very poor overall.
I'm just not in the "team" that thinks the console should stay alone with no future visibility as long as it sells decently enough.
These bundles look like post next gen release clearing stock. It's just sad to look at.
So if Nintendo can do their 15M with that, close to 8 years in, then i have nothing else to say. It just feels wrong from a business point of view.
They recently released that "future outlook" that has 3 key points that I was baffled with.
- Nintendo Switch will enter its 8th year.
- New titles will continue to be released.
- (...) maintaining business momentum.
The first one just shows how tired they're going to make many people from the Switch as time passes. Trying to make you upgrade your old rusty 2017 switch to an almost similar oled model. Valve understood upgrades better. Even de New 3ds did as well.
The second is either nothing, as long as a next Switch comes in, or very sad when I think about 2023 which seemed to try to defeat the purpose of what the switch was trying to be before.
The third one is just a vast joke.
What momentum do you maintain with 8 years of the exact same thing that is not at all future proof and already has 3 years of everyone else working with new hardwares.
Not that we need new stuff all the time, but the Switch is not yet at a point where they can stop updating. It needs a little bit more to reach the tipping point of diminishing returns, like the others.
At this point they should think Switch brand momentum, not 2017 switch momentum.
All they make me want is to be interested in steam deck, beside not having any steam game yet.
Everyone feel free to disagree. That's just my opinion. Nothing important.
So why wait for the next one if it can still sell.
Since a lot of people seems to say "the Switch still has a lot of sales power bla bla...
May as well refresh the brand while keeping some nice deals and interest for the previous Switch.
You probably quoted the wrong part.
I don't really disagree. But it wouldn't be a great achievement really.
Feels more like luck at this point, especially factoring covid in the equation.
I wasn't really trying to be too accurate about numbers, which I should probably have.
I just feel like stretching until it breaks just to reach the record doesn't feel the same as a DS or PS2 still selling a lot despite the next hardware announced or even available.
It's really not the same.
It doesn't matter what anything here feels like to anyone.
The Switch OLED is a massive success. The New 3DS was nowhere close to that and more likely than not created consumer confusion both with it's name and simply with the barrage of 3DS models on the market.
What exactly is Valve understanding better there? Do you think the Switch OLED only has a better screen and nothing else?
It has a significantly better build quality, a better, really good stand, double the storage, better speakers, a LAN drive. Just holding it, it feels premium. That means a lot to the consumer. That's why the complaining about the price died down as soon as people got them in their hands.
Using lower selling, less successful products as example of how Nintendo should handle Switch upgrades makes no sense.
This is about this current fiscal year, where 15M is very likely to be reached. This is not about next fiscal year. There they will eventually need a new console.
These bundles are an undeniably effective way to push console sales and reach the target easier and more efficiently. It doesn't matter one bit wether it seems sad or feels wrong to you. Do bundles like these ever even happen post next gen? It's not like they have strong discounts. It's just the game for free.
Were you saying the same thing when Sony sold the PS4 for 200€ bundled with three free games in like 2017 and 2018?
Are you suggesting they should just not have any bundles? Or release the Switch 2 right now despite it still selling strongly?
Because these bundles look sad to you?
Wtf even is your argument here?
Just because Nintendo isn't yet at the point of diminishing returns, doesn't mean they should upgrade their hardware regularly with more powerful models. They would be more expensive and you'd have what happened with the PS4 Pro. It'd be the lowest selling model.
Most people are not interested in the Steam Deck. And especially not because the Switch is old. It's still getting great games regularly.
"May as well refresh the brand."
You seriously think they should have released the next gen console now?
This is not a "may as well" situation. They are supposed to take this seriously. Not throw out new consoles on a whim because of some arbitrary point where the Switch is apparently to old.
How the fuck is the Switch still selling strongly an argument for releasing the next gen console asap?
Are you sure you got my point as it's intended ?
We're still not at DS/PS2 so why does Japan specifically matters when it comes to sales post next hardware reveal ?
I don't think we're talking about the same thing.
Basically I want to see Nintendo have the balls to announce the next hardware and see how the current Switch trajectory evolves.
And this makes even less sense. What are you even saying? They should on purpose potentially sabotage the Switch sales potential this holiday quarter by announcing the next console prematurely? In what way exactly would that help them?
"See how the current Switch trajectory evolves." How does that help anyone with anything?
It's current trajectory is strong. That's all Nintendo or anyone needs to know.
Like Sony sabotaged their PS4 holiday with the ps5 ?
But really, do you have so little faith in the Switch to think that the sales would completely stop if they talked about the next system ?
I didn't know late buyers were the same as the day 1 people.
For me it would revive the brand instead of installing it in that supposed complimentary console to your main entertainment system at best.
Anyway. I was always thinking they would wait for January. That was the last limit. Not so surprised.
I have the right to want something I also think should, or might, happen.
Why should it be used against me ?
Also I want it mostly because my unit is severely dying.
But what I think they should or will do is absolutely not de ided by what I want.
There are a lot of things I think some companies should do that I really don't especially like at all.
Why exactly January? And why is that "the last limit"? Is it the limit of your patience?
"For me it would revive the brand instead of installing it in that supposed complimentary console to your main entertainment system at best."
And where is this coming from? Since when is this the case? Where are you getting this from?
The Switch needs to be revived?
What???
It's just a complementary console at best?
What???
There is a right point to announce a new console and to release it. And that point is not now, when they just released this consoles last big heavy hitter while it's still selling so incredibly strongly.
Following your argument they "may as well" have released the next gen console in November 2022. Oh no worries that it doesn't have any exclusives ready at all.
Not an issue that the 3DS had to deal with, right? RIGHT?
WRONG!
They sabotaged the DS' strong momentum and created a poor first impression of the 3DS with it's barely existing launch lineup and high price.
They seem to have learned from their mistakes. They need a very strong first year lineup.
You have not learned from their mistakes. Leading a huge multi-billion dollar company is not a game where you do and say shit because you want to have "the balls".
There is zero benefit from announcing a console more than half a year in advance.
If there is, then please explain to me what this benefit is.
The Switch right now has significantly better momentum than any other console ever before at this point in it's life. It doesn't need revival or anything like that.